Review a comprehensive coverage analysis of AMP1 vs. AMP2.
| Category | Total | Compatible | Alternative | Missing | Coverage % |
|---|
| Core Methods | 14 | 6 (43%) | 6 (43%) | 2 (14%) | 86% |
| Event Methods | 8 | 2 (25%) | 6 (75%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
| Utility Methods | 12 | 0 (0%) | 2 (17%) | 10 (83%) | 17% |
| Transform Methods | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (100%) | 0% |
| Properties | 62 | 3 (5%) | 35 (56%) | 24 (39%) | 61% |
| Overall | 101 | 11 (11%) | 49 (49%) | 41 (40%) | 60% |
| Category | Total | Direct | Alternative | Missing | Coverage % |
|---|
| Playback Events | 18 | 10 (56%) | 6 (33%) | 2 (11%) | 89% |
| Quality Events | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
| Load Events | 5 | 1 (20%) | 2 (40%) | 2 (40%) | 60% |
| Media Events | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (100%) | 0% |
| UI Events | 4 | 0 (0%) | 2 (50%) | 2 (50%) | 50% |
| Ad Events | 3 | 5 (63%) | 3 (37%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
| Error Events | 3 | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
| Custom Events | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | 0% |
| Overall | 53 | 20 (38%) | 18 (34%) | 15 (28%) | 72% |
| Feature Category | Risk Level | Migration Complexity | Business Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|
| Basic Playback | Low | Simple | Critical | Direct API mapping |
| DRM | Low | Simple | High | Configuration update |
| Client-side Ads (IMA) | Low | Simple | High | Direct integration |
| Server-side Ads (DAI) | Medium | Moderate | High | Platform-specific approach |
| Standard Analytics | Low | Simple | Medium | Use integration modules |
| Custom Analytics | High | Complex | Medium | Rewrite data pipeline |
| Data Bindings | High | Complex | High | Complete refactoring |
| Media Transforms | High | Complex | Medium | Network API rewrite |
| Custom Plugins | High | Very Complex | Variable | Full redevelopment |
| UI Customization | Medium | Moderate | Low | Use Bitmovin UI framework |
| Low Latency | Low | Simple | High | Built-in support |
| Offline Playback | Medium | Moderate | Medium | Platform differences |
| 360/VR Content | Low | Simple | Low | Supported |