Review a comprehensive coverage analysis of AMP1 vs. AMP2.
Category | Total | Compatible | Alternative | Missing | Coverage % |
---|
Core Methods | 14 | 6 (43%) | 6 (43%) | 2 (14%) | 86% |
Event Methods | 8 | 2 (25%) | 6 (75%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
Utility Methods | 12 | 0 (0%) | 2 (17%) | 10 (83%) | 17% |
Transform Methods | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (100%) | 0% |
Properties | 62 | 3 (5%) | 35 (56%) | 24 (39%) | 61% |
Overall | 101 | 11 (11%) | 49 (49%) | 41 (40%) | 60% |
Category | Total | Direct | Alternative | Missing | Coverage % |
---|
Playback Events | 18 | 10 (56%) | 6 (33%) | 2 (11%) | 89% |
Quality Events | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
Load Events | 5 | 1 (20%) | 2 (40%) | 2 (40%) | 60% |
Media Events | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (100%) | 0% |
UI Events | 4 | 0 (0%) | 2 (50%) | 2 (50%) | 50% |
Ad Events | 3 | 5 (63%) | 3 (37%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
Error Events | 3 | 2 (67%) | 1 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 100% |
Custom Events | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | 0% |
Overall | 53 | 20 (38%) | 18 (34%) | 15 (28%) | 72% |
Feature Category | Risk Level | Migration Complexity | Business Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
---|
Basic Playback | Low | Simple | Critical | Direct API mapping |
DRM | Low | Simple | High | Configuration update |
Client-side Ads (IMA) | Low | Simple | High | Direct integration |
Server-side Ads (DAI) | Medium | Moderate | High | Platform-specific approach |
Standard Analytics | Low | Simple | Medium | Use integration modules |
Custom Analytics | High | Complex | Medium | Rewrite data pipeline |
Data Bindings | High | Complex | High | Complete refactoring |
Media Transforms | High | Complex | Medium | Network API rewrite |
Custom Plugins | High | Very Complex | Variable | Full redevelopment |
UI Customization | Medium | Moderate | Low | Use Bitmovin UI framework |
Low Latency | Low | Simple | High | Built-in support |
Offline Playback | Medium | Moderate | Medium | Platform differences |
360/VR Content | Low | Simple | Low | Supported |